Leaks and Leakers

“I’ve been in Washington for more than three decades. In that time I’ve been a deputy undersecretary of defense, and have made the career change to journalism.

And in both capacities, I’ve come to know one overriding fact: no one in the government leaks by accident. Whomever the leaker is, he or she is pushing an agenda.

And the leaks — if they are from the CIA — were meant to change the behavior of our government and other governments helping us combat terrorists. The leakers’ agenda cannot be explained otherwise.”

Jed Babbin, writing in Human Events about Rowan Scarborough’s new book, “Sabotage: America’s Enemies Within the CIA.”

Howell Raines, former New York Times executive editor, had a slightly different take on leakers.

What Next?

Suppose we decide to withdraw from the Middle East. What then?

Maybe we can just pretend it isn’t there.

Or maybe we could send them some “good will ambassadors” to help “make nice” with them. Perhaps open trade talks with them?

Before you get locked in on this line of thought, it might be useful to check out a new think piece by Victor Davis Hanson: Back to the Future? The Mideast landscape.

Something to think about.

Immigration reform six years away?

Rep. Rahm Emanuel of Illinois, an architect of the Democratic campaign that regained control of the House last year, says his party will not attempt comprehensive immigration reform until at least the second term of a prospective Democratic president.

The congressman’s statement was reported by a Hispanic activist and confirmed by Mr. Emanuel. “Congressman Rahm Emanuel said to me two weeks ago, there is no way this legislation is happening in the Democratic House, in the Democratic Senate, in the Democratic presidency, in the first term,” Juan Salgado, board chairman of the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, told the National Council of La Raza (NCLR) at its annual convention last weekend.

Mr. Emanuel’s assessment of the political realities discouraged Hispanics working for immigration reform now.

“I was caught off-guard by the statement,” Mr. Salgado said in an interview. “I interpret his comments as a lack of courage on what they know is right. Listen, we’re here at the NCLR conference, and what it’s going to take is not the attitude of Rahm Emanuel, if this is a second-term issue. What it’s going to take is boldness by the president.”

Details -> here

Who’s driving the bus?

A stroll through the U.S. Senate web site will bring you to the following passage, from the Party Leadership section (also here):

Although party floor leadership posts carry great responsibility, they provide few specific powers. Instead, floor leaders have largely had to depend on their individual skill, intelligence, and personality. Majority leaders seek to balance the needs of senators of both parties to express their views fully on a bill with the pressures to move the bill as quickly as possible toward enactment. These conflicting demands have required majority leaders to develop skills in compromise, accommodation, and diplomacy. Lyndon Johnson, who held the post in the 1950s, once said that the greatest power of the majority leader was “the power of persuasion.” (Emphasis added.)

That’s not what’s on the tube these days, is it?

There’s precious little compromise, accommodation, and diplomacy going on in the Senate.

Is the Majority Leader in thrall to some power behind the curtain?

Is he just taking the tickets while Someone Else drives the bus?

Inquiring minds want to know. And the rest of us, too.

Bumper Sticker Awards

The semi-annual Bumper Sticker Awards will soon be announced.

While the votes are still being tallied, there seems to be little doubt about the winner.

It will almost certainly be the 110th Congress, mainly due to a late surge of votes during the recent Senate sleep-over.

Valerie Plame Redux

Four years ago this month, Bob Novak introduced the name Valerie Plame to us all.

Yesterday, Tim Russert and Novak talked about Novak’s new book, “The Prince of Darkness: 50 Years of Reporting in Washington” and how the Plame story got started.

Here’s the transcript from NBC News’ MEET THE PRESS.

MR. RUSSERT: You begin the book, as you might expect, a discussion of the whole Valerie Plame situation. Let me read a little bit and talk about it.

“I was ushered into [Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage’s] office promptly at 3 p.m. [on July 8, 2003]. for my visit. I assumed, however, that what Armitage said would not be attributed to him but would not be off the record. That is, I could write about information he gave me, but would not identify him by name. I then asked Armitage a question. Why would the CIA send Joseph Wilson on the mission to Niger? ‘Well,’ Armitage replied, ‘you know his wife works at CIA, and she suggested that he be sent to Niger.’ ‘His wife works at’” the “‘CIA?’ I asked. ‘Yeah, in counterproliferation,’” he, he said. “He mentioned her by first name, Valerie. Armitage smiled and said: ‘That’s real Evans and Novak, isn’t it?’” Suggesting a green light to print it, in your mind.

MR. NOVAK: That’s right, of course.

MR. RUSSERT: Then you go on to say in the book, “Senior White House adviser Karl Rove returned my call late that afternoon,” July 8th, 2003, the same day.

“I mentioned” “I had heard that Wilson’s wife worked at the CIA in the counterproliferation section and that she had suggested Wilson be sent to Niger. I distinctly remember Rove’s reply: ‘Oh, you know that, too.’ Rove and I also discussed other aspects of Wilson’s mission, but since he never has disclosed them publicly, neither have I.” So you considered Rove’s comments, “Oh, you know that, too,” as a confirmation?

MR. NOVAK: Yes. And of course, there’s also a third source, and that was the public relations man at the CIA, Bill Harlow, who, who admitted, who confirmed that she worked in the counterproliferation division. But he said that she didn’t suggest the—that her husband go. That’s—I think that was an incorrect information he gave me, but I I also put that in the column, that a source from the CIA said he was—she was not suggest—he did—she did not suggest her husband make the mission.

MR. RUSSERT: In hindsight, should you have identified Valerie Plame as a CIA agent?

MR. NOVAK: There was no indication by, by the official spokesman for the CIA or anybody else that anybody was put in danger, that—I suddenly didn’t get a direct call from George Tenet, the CIA director, who I knew. And if he wanted to stop me from doing it, he could’ve, so I, I saw there was no pressure from me. They asked me not, not to use her name, but didn’t say that it was anybody in danger or there was any security violation as a result.

MR. RUSSERT: The president said early on in this that if anyone broke the law, that he would deal with it. And now he’s saying, “Well, I wish that someone had come forward and raised their hand and said this had happened, but let’s move on.”

MR. NOVAK: Well, Mr. Armitage did come forward. He, he—before a special prosecutor was even named, he had—after a story appeared in which I said there was not a partisan gunslinger who gave me the information, he identified himself to the Justice Department. So they—that did come forward. And, of course, the wrong investigation by Mr. Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor, came after they knew that—who had been the leaker and had made a decision, obviously, that no law had been broken. Because nobody was ever pros—Mr. Armitage was not prosecuted, nobody else was prosecuted.

Trust, but verify

The North Korean government told the United States on Saturday that it had switched off its nuclear facilities in Yongbyon, 60 miles north of Pyongyang, shortly after a South Korean ship unloaded the first shipment of fuel aid in North Korea.
More->

Madeline Albright – Secretary of State under Clinton, and responsible for the nuclear anti-proliferation treaty with North Korea, was asked point-blank on NBC NEWS’ MEET THE PRESS:

But didn’t North Korea develop a nuclear bomb on Bill Clinton’s watch?

Her response?

. . . . as it turns out, they were cheating. . . .

Ronald Reagan said it: Trust, but verify.

Opposition and Truth

“Men often oppose a thing merely because they have had no agency in planning it, or because it may have been planned by those whom they dislike.” — Alexander Hamilton

“Truth is confirmed by inspection and delay; falsehood by haste and uncertainty.” — Tacitus

Something to think about while watching the news.

Depends on the Yardstick

The Senate and House in the 110th Congress want to pull the plug on Iraq, according to usually reliable sources, because the Iraqi government hasn’t gotten anything done, at least, none of the really important stuff.

Insiders say the Iraqi lawmakers, although new at the game, are determined to “get it done” as more than one visitor from the 110th Congress has stressed.

One source has been following the “Rename the Post Offices” initiative around the war torn countryside, and reports that almost every post office that is still usable has been renamed.

We hear that the “Minimum Wage Law” initiative is nearing completion.

The “Earmarks” initiative is the trickiest: the old name (“pork”) just couldn’t be used in Iraq, and the 110th Congress model, which they’re trying to follow, changes faster than they can keep up. Also, this is territory that involves a tangle of ancient tribal and family issues that may well defy quick solutions.

However, the “Homeland Security” initiative, modeled after the US organization, has been postponed for the present, pending additional studies.

Nevertheless, there is a small but growing group of supporters who are convinced that Iraq will fashion a distinct new government befitting the unique heritage of that ancient land.

And maybe they might then return the favor and help us jump start our own lawmaking apparatus. Maybe a new slogan . . . .

Maybe.

Sticks and Stones . . .

Suppose someone had a program on radio where they just read the Bible aloud, from day to day, perhaps beginning on the first day of the year, and continuing to read from day to day until they had read through the whole Bible, and finished the final words of the Bible, perhaps, on the last day of the year. No commentary, just reading aloud the text, over the “public” air waves.

Would that be construed as hate speech, in the proposed legislation being discussed by lawmakers?

There are several English translations of the Bible in common use.

Would changing from one version to another lead to a court battle over which translation the aggrieved party considered the most, or least hateful?

Would the translators, themselves, be held liable?

First, do no harm

The phrase has come down through time as a comforting symbol of the healing hands of our doctors and medical practitioners.

Until now.

Now the thought that we were safe behind those two big moats called oceans has begun to waver.

Soon the change will touch that political campaign that dominates our daily news cycle.

The poll takers are already recalibrating their questions and population criteria.

Even now, makers of bumper stickers are busy rolling out new versions.

There’s a new gorilla in the room.

Overhauling U.N. Headquarters


UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) – U.S. architect Michael Adlerstein, who has helped renovate buildings ranging from the Statue of Liberty to the Taj Mahal, will take over the lagging project to restore U.N. headquarters, the United Nations said on Monday.

Adlerstein, a New Yorker, will be the new executive director of the so-called capital master plan, a $1.88 billion plan to modernize the iconic 55-year-old skyscraper overlooking Manhattan’s East River, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon announced.

The blue-tinted glass and steel 38-story structure, whose original architects included France’s Le Corbusier, has been increasingly showing its age. It has water dripping through its roof, toxic asbestos lining its ceiling tiles, no sprinklers in case of fire, and erratic heating and cooling systems.

Planning to refurbish it originally began in 1995 but no work has started and the project is not expected to be completed until 2014. The current plan calls for a temporary structure to be erected on the U.N. lawn to accommodate staff.

More details ->

John Bolton may have some suggestions about overhauling the UN headquarters.